AviationLive Forum Index AviationLive
Aviation - Military - Geopolitics Issues Talk
HomeHome   ForumForum   Image GalleryImage Gallery   Video GalleryVideo Gallery
 
FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   CalendarCalendar   RegisterRegister
ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in

F-35 Thread
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    AviationLive Forum Index -> Military Aviation  Military Aviation
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
grandekinoks
Corporal
Corporal


Joined: 24 May 2009
Posts: 34
Location: turkey

PostPosted: Sun Jun 21, 2009 9:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

we ordered 116 pieces F35. they will be delivery on 2014-2019.
_________________
---------------------------------------
MUSTAFA KEMAL ATATURK.
NE MUTLU TURKUM DIYENE !!!
---------------------------------------
Back to top
tasoscorsair
General
General


Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 4596
Location: Athens

PostPosted: Sun Jun 21, 2009 10:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

We have siged for 75 F-22 Raptors, arrival date 2013
_________________
live today like there is no tomorow and tomorow like you've never lived before...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u0rMe2Vyb9E


IN I TRUST
Back to top
grandekinoks
Corporal
Corporal


Joined: 24 May 2009
Posts: 34
Location: turkey

PostPosted: Sun Jun 21, 2009 10:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

tasoscorsair wrote:
We have siged for 75 F-22 Raptors, arrival date 2013



can you send me the urrl ? I am sure you are seeing the dream TASOSCORSAIR.
_________________
---------------------------------------
MUSTAFA KEMAL ATATURK.
NE MUTLU TURKUM DIYENE !!!
---------------------------------------
Back to top
tasoscorsair
General
General


Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 4596
Location: Athens

PostPosted: Sun Jun 21, 2009 11:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

someone else is in a dream, I am just jokeing..... grandenikos
_________________
live today like there is no tomorow and tomorow like you've never lived before...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u0rMe2Vyb9E


IN I TRUST
Back to top
nomad
Captain
Captain


Joined: 28 Aug 2007
Posts: 386

PostPosted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 7:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I found this in mr Kopp 's page but I don t know if this is true:


The sustained turning performance of the F-35A Lightning II was recently disclosed as 4.95 G at Mach 0.8 and 15,000 ft. A 1969 F-4E Phantom II could sustain 5.5 Gs at 0.8 Mach with 40 percent internal fuel at 20,000 feet. The F-35 is also much slower than the 1960s F-4E or F-105D. So the F-35A’s aerodynamic performance is ‘retrograde’ when compared with 1960s legacy fighters. The consequence of such inferior JSF performance is that its DAS might detect an incoming missile, but the aircraft lacks the turn-rate to out-fly it.
Back to top
tasoscorsair
General
General


Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 4596
Location: Athens

PostPosted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 7:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

any link?
_________________
live today like there is no tomorow and tomorow like you've never lived before...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u0rMe2Vyb9E


IN I TRUST
Back to top
nomad
Captain
Captain


Joined: 28 Aug 2007
Posts: 386

PostPosted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 8:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

http://www.ausairpower.net/APA-NOTAM-300309-1.html
They say that this is undisclosed infos from Lock-mart
Back to top
anders110
General
General


Joined: 30 Aug 2007
Posts: 1731
Location: Finland

PostPosted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 11:03 am    Post subject: beats F-4 for sure Reply with quote

nomad wrote:
I found this in mr Kopp 's page but I don t know if this is true:


The sustained turning performance of the F-35A Lightning II was recently disclosed as 4.95 G at Mach 0.8 and 15,000 ft. A 1969 F-4E Phantom II could sustain 5.5 Gs at 0.8 Mach with 40 percent internal fuel at 20,000 feet. The F-35 is also much slower than the 1960s F-4E or F-105D. So the F-35A’s aerodynamic performance is ‘retrograde’ when compared with 1960s legacy fighters. The consequence of such inferior JSF performance is that its DAS might detect an incoming missile, but the aircraft lacks the turn-rate to out-fly it.


I think its not necessary to compare modern hi-tech against 50s technology(though F-4 is a great plane)....surely F-35 beats F-4 in all aspects maybe not in speed but its not so important anymore if you reach 1.6 or 2 machs.
Modern aircraft uses light and durable materials so body/wings can take more stress than old steel-titanium alloys. Engines give more thrust being only half weight of the old designs. That 4.95G given to F-35 could be a limiter adjust for sustained turn as was mentioned. F-35 has huge engine-thrust 19000kg and 42m2 wing area and flat fuselage that lifts too, both aircraft weigh the same 13000kg empty but F-4 looses in enginepower some 3000kg, so F-35 can surely turn and turn if needed. Why would they design so poor aircraft that it would be inferior to 50s design Rolling Eyes
_________________
stupid is stupid does
Back to top
el
General
General


Joined: 02 Sep 2007
Posts: 3262

PostPosted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 6:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

F-35 Chief Fired, Money Withheld From Lockheed
U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates fired the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter program manager Feb. 1, saying someone must be held accountable for the program's delays and cost overruns.

News of the dismissal of U.S. Marine Corps Maj. Gen. David R. Heinz came at the beginning of a media briefing about the fiscal 2011 defense budget, released a short time earlier. The proposed budget, which must be approved by Congress, includes $10.7 billion for 43 F-35s.


"To now move forward in this program in a realistic way, one cannot absorb the additional costs that we have in this program and the delays without people being held accountable," Gates told reporters at the briefing, televised live on The Pentagon Channel. "If I have set one tone here at the Department of Defense - when things go wrong, people will be held accountable."

Gates did not name a replacement for Heinz but did say he will upgrade the position from a two-star billet to a three-star billet. A Pentagon spokesman did not know if the program's deputy manager, U.S. Air Force Maj. Gen. C.D. Moore, will take over in an acting role.

In addition to firing Hines, Gates announced the Defense Department is withholding $614 million in performance fees from the F-35's lead maker, Lockheed Martin. The company will not oppose the action, he said.

Late last year, an internal Pentagon report showed the new stealth fighter was so far behind schedule that DoD would have to spend as much as $16.6 billion to get its largest weapons program back on track. At that time, Pentagon acquisitions chief Ashton Carter told Lockheed Martin officials that the company would have to help pay the cost overruns.

The Annual Report of the Pentagon's Director of Operation Test and Evaluation, released in January, showed the F-35 program flew only 16 of the 168 test flights scheduled for 2009
. The test flights could not be flown due to delays in aircraft deliveries, which set the program back another year.
http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?i=4480268&c=AIR&s=TOP
_________________
A person needs a little madness, or else ... to dare cut the rope and be free.
Back to top
Mix
General
General


Joined: 31 Aug 2007
Posts: 1235
Location: Србија

PostPosted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 6:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

They are realy stuck with it, just look at having a great start(complete plans of Yak-141) and money from dozens of countries
I can only imagine dissapointment when degraded versions reach participating airforces `over the puddle`
There is lot in stake here
_________________
Христос Васкрсе!


`А судије нека суде по закону а не по страху од царства ми! `


http://www.spc.yu/Vesti-2004/pogrom.html

History of Kosovo-facts
Back to top
Elfot
General
General


Joined: 01 Sep 2007
Posts: 2856

PostPosted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 7:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I wonder why the partner Nations haven't started to complain yet... Confused
_________________


Back to top
tasoscorsair
General
General


Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 4596
Location: Athens

PostPosted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 9:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Elfot wrote:
I wonder why the partner Nations haven't started to complain yet... Confused

I think thats because many nations see the US economy as a lifejacket (amazingly with in this crisis) plus the US are a major ally for external politics games.
_________________
live today like there is no tomorow and tomorow like you've never lived before...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u0rMe2Vyb9E


IN I TRUST
Back to top
mp210
V.I.P. Member


Joined: 27 Aug 2007
Posts: 5440
Location: Piraeus

PostPosted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 11:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Same case from New York times
http://finance.yahoo.com/banking-budgeting/article/108749/gates-tries-to-get-f35-program-back-on-course
Back to top
el
General
General


Joined: 02 Sep 2007
Posts: 3262

PostPosted: Wed Mar 10, 2010 8:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Delays to postpone F-35 Israel deal
Major delays in the production of the fifth-generation stealth F-35 Joint Strike Fighter will likely lead to the postponement of Israel’s procurement plans, which initially set the signing of a contract by the end of March.

One top IDF officer told The Jerusalem Post on Sunday that the Defense Ministry was unlikely to sign a letter of agreement (LOA) with the Pentagon before the end of 2010.

“Everything now appears to be pushed off by at least a year,” the senior officer said.

On Sunday night, IDF Chief of General Staff Lt.-Gen. Gabi Ashkenazi flew to Washington for talks with top Pentagon officials. Ashkenazi plans to speak with his American counterpart, Adm. Michael Mullen, and other Pentagon officials about the delays in the production of the JSF and how it will affect the IDF.

Last week, US Air Force Secretary Michael Donley said that the service’s plan to use the F-35 will probably be delayed by two years and cost significantly more than the $130 million initially expected.

Donley said that the F-35 would not be ready for the US Air Force until 2015, the date that Israel had initially wanted to begin receiving the stealth jet. The jet had been scheduled to become initially operational in 2013 before the Pentagon uncovered serious problems with the contract. Last month, Defense Secretary Robert Gates announced that at least one senior manager would be fired and $614 million in performance bonuses would be withheld from lead contractor Lockheed Martin Corporation.

“If the Americans are only getting the plane in 2015, then it is difficult to imagine that we will receive it the same time,” the officer said, adding that the Air Force was currently in talks with the Pentagon about locking down a delivery date.

News of the delays in the F-35 program came as Israel and the US moved closer to finalizing details of the deal, long held up by disagreements over the integration of Israeli indigenous technology into the aircraft. The IAF plans to phase out old-model F-16s after it receives the F-35.


Israel had planned to order a first squadron of 25 jets within the coming months and to procure another 50 by the end of the decade. Due to the delays, some IAF officers are calling for a review of the procurement plans and to consider the possible purchase of additional F-15Is made by Boeing Company. Israel already has a squadron of F-15Is that are capable of carrying massive amounts of weaponry and flying long distances, including to Iran.
http://www.jpost.com/Home/Article.aspx?id=170428
_________________
A person needs a little madness, or else ... to dare cut the rope and be free.
Back to top
el
General
General


Joined: 02 Sep 2007
Posts: 3262

PostPosted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 6:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Fighter jet contract goes down -Denmark
The Joint Strike Fighter saga has apparently come to an end after several years of negotiations with the US government


After a week where it was announced there would be yet another price increase for potential buyers, the Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) is no longer being considered by the Danish Defence Command as a replacement for its aging F-16s war planes, reports public broadcaster DR.


Since negotiations for purchasing the planes began in 1999 between Denmark and US Department of Defense – which has been heavily involved in the development of the Lockheed Martin jet – the cost of a single plane has risen from around 275 million kroner to 540 million.

The JSF project has been plagued with problems since its inception. The original release date for the plane was set for 2012, although now US officials say the jet will not be ready until 2016. In addition, the project took a major hit last month when the man heading it was fired by US Defence Secretary, Robert Gates,due to the jet’s continued development delays.

Despite having invested considerably in the JSF project – with several companies securing eventual work contracts for the planes should they have been purchased – the Danish government is now leaning toward Boeing’s F-18 Superhornet as its preferred choice.

In April last year, Boeing promised to ensure orders worth up to 20 billion kroner for Danish companies if the military purchased the company’s Superhornet model.

A decision on which jet will replace the F-16s is expected to be made by parliament some time in 2012.
http://www.cphpost.dk/news/national/88-national/48516-fighter-jet-contract-goes-down.html
_________________
A person needs a little madness, or else ... to dare cut the rope and be free.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    AviationLive Forum Index -> Military Aviation All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Page 2 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
powered by ArgenBLUE free template